Ram Sawari Devi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9535 of 2021 ====================================================== Ram Sawari Devi Wife of Late Shivaji Thakur resident of Village - Pakadi Narotam, Police Station Panapur District- Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Inspector General of Police, Saran.

3.

The Deputy Inspector General of Police, Saran at Chapra. 4.

The Superintendent of Police, Saran at Chapra. 5.

The Superintendent of Police, Patna.

6.

Jagannath Thakur, A.S.I. (Hawaldar) Police Line Saran at Chapra, P.S. Mufasil Saran, District- Saran (Chapra).

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Anand Kishore Choudhary, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Md. N.H. Khan, SC 1 Mr. Virendra Kuar, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P. B. BAJANTHRI ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 08-03-2022 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2. In the instant petition, petitioner has prayed for the following relief/reliefs:

"That this is an application for issuance of appropriate Writ and/or direction and/or order directing the respondents to see that the petitioner is paid her maintenance as fixed by the Superintendent of Police, Patna.

The petitioner further prays that the Respondents be directed to see that the petitioner is paid her arrears of her maintenance as well the current maintenance."

Patna High Court CWJC No.9535 of 2021 dt.08-03-2022 2/2

3. The petitioner is stated to have imposed certain conditions in respect of appointment of 6th respondent - Jagannath Thakur on compassionate ground like maintaining the petitioner. The 6th respondent after his appointment on compassionate ground stated to have not adhered to the conditions imposed by the petitioner in respect of maintaining. These are all the civil disputed matter which is required to be addressed before the appropriate forum. Disputed facts cannot be examined under Article 226 of the Constitution.

4. Accordingly, the petitioner has not made out case.

5. Hence, writ petition stands dismissed, reserving liberty to invoke appropriate law and approach appropriate forum. (P. B. Bajanthri, J) GAURAV S./- AFR/NAFR CAV DATE Uploading Date 10.03.2022 Transmission Date