Vikesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8089 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-859 Year-2019 Thana- VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVaishali ====================================================== Vikesh Kumar Son of Baleshwar Sah Resident of Village Muriyari, P.S.- Sakara, District Muzaffarpur.
... ... Petitioner
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Priti Kumari W/o Vikesh Kumar Resident of Village Muriyari, P.S.- Sakara, District- Muzaffarpur, At Present D/o Hari Narayan Sah @ Narayan Sah, Village - Bhagwanpur Khajuri, P.S.- Waligaon, District - Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner :
Mr. Manohar Prasad Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party :
Mrs. Veena Kumari Jaiswal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 02-03-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing on behalf of the State. The petitioner, who is the husband of the complainant, is apprehending arrest in connection with Complaint Case No. 859(C) of 2019 for offences under Sections 498A, 323 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The allegation against the petitioner is that he has tortured opposite party no. 2 for non-fulfillment of dowry demand.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent and marriage between the petitioner and opposite party no. 2 took place in the year 2017.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8089 of 2020(2) dt.02-03-2020 2/2 The petitioner is ready to keep his wife (opposite party no. 2) with full honour and dignity.
Considering the aforesaid and in order to restore normalcy in conjugal life between the petitioner and opposite party no.2, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Let petitioner, above-named, in the event of arrest or surrender within four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Complaint Case No. 859(C) of 2019, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. In the event the petitioner neglects, misbehaves or torture the complainant (opposite party no. 2), the court below shall be at liberty to cancel his bail bond.
(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) BT/- U T