Patna High CourtCWJC/12506/2017disposed

Shyam Sundar Ram And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-05-15Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.12506 of 2017 ======================================================

1. Shyam Sundar Ram son of Jago Ram Rajbar resident of village - Sabda, P.S. - Dismobra, Panchayat - Marui, P.S. - Roh, District - Nawada.

2. Kaushalya Devi wife of Sukhdeo Ram resident of Village - Sadipur, P.O. - Kadirganj, P.S. Nawada, District - Nawada. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Govt. of Bihar, Patna New Secretariat, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, New Secretariat, Patna.

3. The Director Department of Education, Government of Bihar.

4. The District Magistrate, Nawada.

5. The District Education Officer, Nawada.

6. The District Programme Officer (Literacy), Nawada. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Md. Kamaluddin, Advocate Mr. Shashi Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Kameshwar Kumar - G.P.-17 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 15-05-2018 Heard Md. Kamaluddin, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

The petitioners have filed the present writ application for a direction to the respondents to provide training to them according to the guide-line formulated for the purpose of Tola Sevak/Talimi Markaj Volunteer.

Md. Kamaluddin with reference to Annexures-5 to 8 submits that the petitioners have acquired right and expectation for being sent for training and, as such, the respondents may be

Patna High Court CWJC No.12506 of 2017(2) dt.15-05-2018 2/2 directed to send the petitioners for training. Considering the totality of the facts and situation and the nature of engagement of petitioners, the Court does not find substance in the contention of the petitioners. However, liberty shall be available to the petitioners to pursue the remedy before the departmental authority including the Commissioner, which has granted indulgence to these petitioners in the past, so that the petitioners' grievance may be redressed.

With the aforesaid liberty, the writ application stands disposed of.

(Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) spandey/- U