Ajit Kumar Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.476 of 2024 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1831 of 2023 ====================================================== Ajit Kumar Choudhary son of Late Pramod Chandra Choudahry, resident of J157, P.C. Colony, P.O. and P.S.-Kankarbagh, District-Patna-800020. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

Pratyay Amrit, The Principal Secretary, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3.

K.K. Pathak, The Principal Secretary, Education Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Pankaj Kumar Pal, The Principal Secretary, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

5.

Sunil Kumar Ravi, the Principal Secretary, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

6.

The Engineer in Chief, Road Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

7.

Amrendra Kumar Sinha, The Engineer in Chief, Rural Works Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

8.

The Engineer in Chief, Building Construction Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

9.

The Executive Engineer then Education Cell, Building Construction Department, Banka, Bihar.

10.

Shri Mithilesh Kumar, The Executive Engineer, Rural Works Division Marorha, Chapra, Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

AC to Standing Counsel 20 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-08-2025 Heard Mr. Sanjeev Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned AC to SC-20 for the State.

2. In view of the information contained in paragraph

Patna High Court MJC No.476 of 2024(6) dt.22-08-2025 2/2 nos. 5 to 8 of the show cause filed on behalf of the opposite party nos. 4 and 10, I find that the order dated 11.07.2023 passed in CWJC No. 1831 of 2023 has been complied with.

3. The petitioner, if at all, is aggrieved, he may avail appropriate remedy in accordance with law.

4. Accordingly, the present contempt petition is consigned.

(Purnendu Singh, J) Niraj/- U