Sunil Kumar Chaudhary @ Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.7682 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-136 Year-2019 Thana- BARHARIA District- Siwan ====================================================== SUNIL KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ SUNIL KUMAR Son of Bhola Chaudhary @ Bhola Yadav Resident of Village - Padrauna, P.S.- Barhariya, Dist.- Siwan.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Prashant Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Harendra Prasad, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 20-07-2020 As of now the Courts have not resumed normal physical hearing, the matter has been listed today for consideration through the video conferencing. The learned counsels are appearing and making submissions from their residence. The Court Master and Secretary are also part of this virtual court proceedings from their homes, all with the aid of audio visual technology. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as, learned APP for the State.
After some arguments, Mr. Prashant Kumar, counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application to avail the remedy of regular bail. In view of the submissions of the petitioner's counsel
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.7682 of 2020(2) dt.20-07-2020 2/2 the application is permitted to be withdrawn. Withdrawal of the instant anticipatory bail application, however, may not be deemed to be an expression of the opinion of this Court either way. The petitioner's prayer for regular bail is, needless to say, required to be considered without rejection of the prayer for anticipatory bail having any effect on his prayer for regular bail. The court below may consider the application in accordance with law.
The application is permitted to be withdrawn. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) shyambihari/- U T