Upendra Manjhi @ Upendra Kumar Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14847 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-312 Year-2022 Thana- TARAIYA District- Saran ====================================================== 1.

UPENDRA MANJHI @ UPENDRA KUMAR MANJHI Son of Sukhdeo Manjhi Resident of Village - Rahimpur, P.S.- Madhourah, District - Saran at Chapra (Bihar).

2.

Kamlesh Manjhi Son of Late Jitan Manjhi Resident of Village - Rahimpur, P.S.- Madhourah, District - Saran at Chapra (Bihar). ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rakesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Tarkeshwar Nath Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-04-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered under Sections 33, 34 and 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016.

The prosecution case, in short, is that 190 liters wine is recovered.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners have got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. It is alleged that 190 liters wine is recovered by the bank of river. The names of the petitioners have transpired on the basis of disclosure made by the co-accused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14847 of 2023(2) dt.29-04-2023 2/2 suggest the implication of the petitioners in this case. Nothing incriminating has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners had no knowledge regarding the alleged incident. There is no compliance of Section 100 Cr.P.C. Learned counsel for the petitioners has placed reliance upon the order dated 13.04.2022 passed by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in Criminal Appeal No. 626 of 2022 (Sweta Kumari versus State of Bihar). On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the F.I.R./complaint case.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Court below/concerned Court in connection with Taraiya P.S. case No. 312 of 2022, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) Pankaj/- U T