← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./12718/2024bail granted

Sanjay Kumar Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-16Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12718 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-282 Year-2023 Thana- MADHUBANI TOWN DistrictMadhubani ====================================================== Sanjay Kumar Thakur Son of Vishnudeo Thakur Resident of Village- Dhanga East, P.S.- Arer, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Bajaj Finance Company, Kashinath Lane, East Lohanipur, Patna. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ratnakar Jha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 16-05-2024

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the bank Bajaj Finance Company Mr. Dayanand Singh.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 406, 420, 468 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner at the outset submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case. It is next submitted that though it is not in dispute that petitioner obtained KYC from customer but then he handed over the same to Rahul, an employee of the company, who manipulated the documents based on which the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12718 of 2024(5) dt.16-05-2024 2/3 company financed certain persons for purchasing Laptop etc. but when the EMI stopped, it came to the notice of the company that the persons in whose favour the loans were disbursed were fake persons. The learned counsel based on instruction also submits that petitioner is willing to pay an amount of Rs.1,25,000/- to the company, which is half the amount of the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R., but then the same shall not be construed as petitioner accepting his guilt.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the company based on instruction submits that since the petitioner is ready to pay Rs.1,25,000/- in the company's account, as such, the company is not opposing the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with G.R. No.1566/2023, arising out of Madhubani Town P.S. Case

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12718 of 2024(5) dt.16-05-2024 3/3 No.282/2023, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

6. At this stage, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the company submits that he will whats-app the account number of the company on the whats-app number of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner undertakes to communicate the same to the petitioner, so that, the amount as agreed, is credited in the account of the company prior to surrender.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T