← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/3052/2022allowed

Kundan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-03-09Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar,Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3052 of 2022 ====================================================== Kundan Kumar S/o Ramashish Ram, R/o Kangalichouki, Yogiyatalaw, P.S. - Pirpainti, Kirtania, Bhagalpur, Bihar - 813209. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through its Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supply, Government of Bihar, Patna. 2.

The Commissioner, Bhagalpur, Bihar.

3.

The District Magistrate, Bhagalpur, Bihar.

4.

The Sub Divisional Officer - Cum - Licensing Authority, Kahalgaon, Bhagalpur, Bihar.

5.

Block Supply Officer, Pirpainti, Bhagalpur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Puneet Siddhartha, Advocate Mr. Aryan Sinha, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal, SC4 Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh, AC to SC4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR) 09-03-2022 Heard Mr. Aryan Sinha, learned Advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Upendra Pratap Singh for the State.

The petitioner has challenged the order dated 15.07.2021, passed by the licensing authority whereby the licence of the petitioner has been cancelled. The sole ground of challenge is that the order

Patna High Court CWJC No.3052 of 2022(2) dt.09-03-2022 2/3 does not give any reason whatsoever and the licence of the petitioner has been cancelled on the ground that the explanation offered by him is unsatisfactory. This is no order in the eyes of law.

It may be noted that the licence of the petitioner was suspended and show-cause notice was issued to him to which he had replied promptly. None of the grounds taken by him in his defence has been taken into account.

We cannot sustain the aforesaid order.

The order is thus set aside.

The matter is remitted to the licensing authority to pass a fresh order in accordance with law. We further direct that a fresh notice be issued on the petitioner and an opportunity be given to him to reply to all the charges against him and on receipt of the reply, the licensing authority shall pass a final order, providing reasons within a period of sixty days thereafter.

Patna High Court CWJC No.3052 of 2022(2) dt.09-03-2022 3/3 The licensing authority is expected to maintain the timeline provided in this order.

The petition stands allowed and disposed of accordingly.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J.) (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J.) Sanjay/- U