Md Mustak @ Md Mustaque Alam v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20398 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-133 Year-2020 Thana- POTHIYA District- Kishanganj ====================================================== Md Mustak @ Md Mustaque Alam Son Of Akhtar Hussain R/O Vill.- Khanki Naunadi, P.S.- Pothiya, Dist.- Kishanganj ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Onkar Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.A.G ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-07-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State through virtual mode.
Counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks from the date of restoration of normalcy. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections 498A, 323, 308, 341/34 of the Indian Penal Code and 3⁄4 of Dowry Prohibition Act.
Allegation against the petitioner is of committing torture and assault upon the victim due to non-fulfilment of demand of dowry.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20398 of 2021(2) dt.01-07-2021 2/3 petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. So far the offence under Section 308 I.P.C. is concerned, there is no medical report in support of the said allegation. Except for offence under Section 308 I.P.C., rest of the offences are triable by the Magistrate. The petitioner has relied upon the judgment of this Court in the case of Md. Naimul Haque Ansari @ Naimul Haque Ansari & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar, reported in 2006(3) PLJR 182. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the complaint case/F.I.R.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and also the lockdown, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on his personal bond to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Kishanganj in connection with Pothia P.S. case No.133 of 2020 (G.R. No.486 of 2020), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
Once the normalcy is restored, the petitioner shall furnish bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each within a period of eight
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20398 of 2021(2) dt.01-07-2021 3/3 weeks to the satisfaction of the court concerned in connection with the aforesaid case.
If so advised, either of the parties will be at liberty to make an application before the Court below for referring the matter to the District Mediation Centre for the purpose of reconciliation or one time settlement. In case, any such application is made by either of the parties, the court below shall refer the matter to the District Mediation Centre. (Sudhir Singh, J) Narendra/- U T