Primary Agriculture Credit Society And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.563 of 2016 ======================================================
1. Primary Agriculture Credit Society, Ghataon through its Chairman namely Umesh Kumar Singh, son of Late Kashinath Singh, resident of Village Ghataon, P.S. Kudra, District Kaimur at Bhabua.
2. Umesh Kumar Singh, son of Late Kashinath Singh, resident of Village Ghataon, P.S. Kudra, District Kaimur at Bhabua.
3. Primary Agriculture Credit- Society, Kharhana through its Chairman namely Sakir Ansari, Son of Barfati Ansari, resident of VillageBahuara, P.S. Kudra, District Kaimur at Bhabua.
4. Sakir Ansari, Son of Barfati Ansari, resident of Village- Bahuara, P.S. Kudra, District Kaimur at Bhabua.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Civil Supplies, Government of Bihar, Patna.
3. The Principal Secretary, Department of Co-operation, Government of Bihar, Patna.
4. The Registar, Co- operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.
5. The District Magistrate-cum-Collector, Kaimur at Bhabhua.
6. The District Co-operative Officer, Kaimur at Bhabhua. .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance:
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay, GA-12 For the B.S.F.C. : Mr. Shailendra Kumar Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 14-01-2016 Although Mr. Sanjay Kumar espousing the cause of the societies in question has submitted that they are not permitted to discharge the obligations as cast upon them under the provisions of the Bihar Cooperative Societies Act, the Rules framed thereunder as well as the bye laws framed but since there is nothing on record to show whether the grievances so raised has
Patna High Court CWJC No.563 of 2016 (2) dt.14-01-2016 been represented before the authorities concerned, no direction can be issued. The petitioner, if so advised, may raise his grievance before the appropriate authority under the Cooperative Act and which shall be considered by the authority concerned and disposed of in accordance with law.
This application is disposed of accordingly.
(Jyoti Saran, J) S.Sb/- U