Arbind Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.471 of 2025 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5868 of 2024 ====================================================== 1.
Arbind Prasad Singh Son of Late Kamal Prasad Singh @ Kamal Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Khajwatta, Police Station- Bidupur, DistrictVaishali. 2.
Mukesh Kumar Son of Late Kamal Prasad Singh @ Kamal Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Khajwatta, Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. 3.
Sukesh Kumar Son of Late Kamal Prasad Singh @ Kamal Prasad Singh, Resident of Village- Khajwatta, Police Station- Bidupur, District- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar Bihar 2.
Deepak Kumar Singh, Principal Secretary, Rural Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
3.
Jay Kishor Thakur, Chief Engineer, Rural Works Department, Bihar, Patna. 4.
Shams Tabrez, Executive Engineer, Rural Works Department, Work Division, Mahnar, Vaishali.
5.
Yashpal Mina, District Magistrate, Vaishali, Hazipur- Bihar. 6.
Ram Babu Baitha, Sub Divisional Officer (SDO), Hazipur. 7.
Karishma Kumari, Circle Officer, Bidupur, Vaishali. 8.
Kumar Govind, Land Acquisition Officer, Vaishali. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Shiv Pratap, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Government Pleader -4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 20-06-2025 Heard the parties.
2. The present petition has been preferred for the following relief/s:
(i) for initiation of contempt proceeding against the opposite parties for wilful and deliberate violation and non-compliance of order dated 19.06.2024 passed by this
Patna High Court MJC No.471 of 2025(3) dt.20-06-2025 2/2 Court in C.W.J.C. No. 5868 of 2024 whereby & whereunder direction was given to the opposite party no.-5 to look into the matter and to pass an order within four months from the date, the petitioners file their representation with the documents. It is further stated that this Hon'ble Court had directed the Opposite Party No.-8 i.e. the District Land Acquisition Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur shall decide the matter in the next two month and will make the necessary payment to the genuine land holder in the next four weeks after hearing all the necessary parties.
3. As per the affidavit, the representation of the petitioner has been rejected on 20.03.2025.
4. In that background, granting liberty to him to challenge the said order, if he so wants.
5. The contempt petition is disposed of.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U