← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./10880/2022bail granted

Antima Kumari @ Priyanka Kumari v. The State Of Bihar

2022-08-29Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10880 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-29 Year-2020 Thana- PARASI District- Jehanabad ====================================================== 1.

ANTIMA KUMARI @ PRIYANKA KUMARI Daughter of Rajendra Sharma Resident of Village- Kalaunda, P.S.- Parasi in the district of Arwal 2.

Ankit Kumar Son of Rajendra Sharma Resident of Village- Kalaunda, P.S.- Parasi in the district of Arwal 3.

Bhola Kumari @ Khusboo Kumari D/o Rajendra Sharma Resident of Village- Kalaunda, P.S.- Parasi in the district of Arwal 4.

Tinku Kumari D/o Rajendra Sharma Resident of Village- Kalaunda, P.S.- Parasi in the district of Arwal ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sunil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 29-08-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The instant application for anticipatory bail has been filed by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Parasi P.S. Case no. 29 of 2020 instituted for the offence punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 308/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, when the informant ordered the raj-mistri to stop the work, several accused persons including the petitioners started to assault him.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10880 of 2022(2) dt.29-08-2022 2/2 Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners has submitted that petitioners are innocent and have committed no offence. Specific allegation of assault is against co-accused Rajendra Sharma for assaulting the informant by means of iron rod. General and omnibus allegations have been levelled against the petitioners.

Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer of Bail.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case as stated above, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioners on bail. The petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within a period of four weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrender in connection with Parasi P.S. Case no. 29 of 2020, they will be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate1st Class, Arwal subject to the conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U