Nawal Kishore Rai v. The State Of Bihar Through Vigilance
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.107 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -88 Year- 2014 Thana -C.B.I CASE District- PATNA ====================================================== Nawal Kishore Rai, son of late Geeta Rai, resident of village/Mohalla Suryapura, P.S. Bhagwanpur, District Begusarai .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar through Vigilance .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Krishna Chandra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ramakant Sharma, L/O (I.C.Vig) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 08-01-2015 Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and the State. The petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offence under Sections 7/13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.
Considering that the Petitioner is in custody since 21.11.2014 and the entire case is based on documentary evidence which has already been collected and, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the Petitioner behind the bars, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/-(Five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety to be fixed by the court concerned to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Vigilance-II, Patna in connection with Special case No.61 of 2014 arising out of Vigilance P.S. Case No.88 of 2014, subject to the conditions (i)
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.107 of 2015 (2) dt.08-01-2015 2/2 That one of the bailor will be a close relative of the petitioner who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with the petitioner. The bailor will undertake to furnish information to the Court about any change in address of the petitioner. (ii) That the petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse, (iii) That the petitioner will be well represented on each date if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
(Anjana Prakash, J) Narendra/- U T