Ranbir Das @ Ranjit Das @ Feku Das v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No. 1169 of 2015 Arising out of P.S. Case No. -173 Year- 2013 Thana -ASHOK PAPER MILL District- DARBHANGA =================================================== Ranbir Das @ Ranjit Das @ Feku Das son of Janak Das @ Janak Lal Das, resident of Village- Sibasinpur (Sripur Bahadurpur), P.S.- Ashok Paper Mill, District- Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s =================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s: Mr. Raj Kishor Singh (APP) =================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA PRAKASH ORAL ORDER 02.
16.01.2015 Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and the State.
The Petitioner seeks bail in a case instituted for the offences under Sections 372, 379, 366 and 120(B)/34 of the Indian Penal Code.
Considering the statement of the alleged victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C., let the Petitioner, above named who has fair antecedents be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 5,000/- (Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each or any other surety as fixed by the Court to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Darbhanga in connection with A.P.M. P.S. Case No. 173 of 2013 subject to the following conditions:- (i) That one of the bailors will be a close relative of the Petitioner who will give an affidavit giving
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1169 of 2015 (2) dt.16-01-2015 genealogy as to how he is related with the Petitioner. The bailor will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of the Petitioner. (ii) That the affidavit shall clearly state that the Petitioner is not an accused in any other case and if he is he shall not be released on bail. (iii) That the bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the court concerned if the Petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature after his release in the present case and thereafter the court below will be at liberty to initiate the proceeding for cancellation of bail on the ground of misuse.
(iv) That the Petitioner will give an undertaking that he will receive the police papers on the given date and be present on date fixed for charge and if he fails to do so on two given dates and delays the trial in any manner, his bail will be liable to be cancelled for reasons of misuse. (v) That the Petitioner will be well represented on each date and if he fails to do so on two consecutive dates, his bail will be liable to be cancelled.
Vikash/- (Anjana Prakash, J.) U T