Biranjan Kumar @ Birjan Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.311 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-120 Year-2024 Thana- MUFFASIL District- West Champaran ====================================================== Biranjan Kumar @ Birjan Kumar Son of Shambhu Prasad @ Shambhu Prasad Kushwaha Resident of Village - Bagahi Koiri Tola, P.S. - Bairiya, District - West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Director General of Police, Bihar, Patna Bihar 2.
The Inspector General of Police, Tirhut Range, Muzaffarpur Bihar 3.
The Deputy Inspector General of Police, West Champaran at Bettiah Bihar 4.
The Superintendent of Police, Bettiah, West Champaran Bihar 5.
The Officer In Charge, Bettiah Muffasil Police Station, District - West Champaran Bihar 6.
The Investigating Officer of Bettiah Muffasil P.S. Case No. 120 of 2024, P.S. - Muffasil District - West Champaran, Bihar 7.
Suresndra Prasad Son of Late Nandlal Prasad Resident of Village - Nirpur, Ward No.10, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran 8.
Ajit Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Nirpur, Ward No.10, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran 9.
Sudama Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Nirpur, Ward No.10, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran 10.
Jhunna Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Nirpur, Ward No.10, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran 11.
Ritesh Kumar Son of Surendra Prasad Resident of Village - Nirpur, Ward No.10, P.S. - Paharpur, District - East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Sarvesh Kashyap, Advocate Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr. Suman Kumar Jha, AC to AAG-3 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-03-2026
1. On the matter being taken up at the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during pendency of this writ petition, the grievance of the petitioner has been addressed, hence, the cause of this writ petition has lost it's efficiency.
Patna High Court CR. WJC No.311 of 2025(4) dt.10-03-2026 2/2
2. In view of the statement made by Mr. Anant Kumar Mishra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner, the instant writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered, infructuous.
(Sanjay Kumar Singh , J) Raj Ranjan/- U