Patna High CourtCR. MISC./19236/2017dismissed

Amit Kumar @ Dhipla v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-17Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.19236 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -377 Year- 2015 Thana -BEGUSARAI MUFFASIL DistrictBEGUSARAI ======================================================

1. Amit Kumar @ Dhipla Son of Jai Jai Ram Singh Resident of Village - Chhoti Aighu, P.S. - Muffasil, District - Begusarai. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sandip Kumar Gautam For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ajay Kumar -2 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 17-07-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of regular bail in connection with Muffasil P.S.Case No.377 of 2015, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 364, 379 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and also Section 27 of the Arms Act. The petitioner is named in the F.I.R. and the allegation against the petitioner is that he called the deceased from his house and since then, the deceased was traceless. Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that he has been falsely implicated in this case and there is no evidence against the petitioner. No any investigation has been made of the C.D.R. of the Mobile. The petitioner is in custody for about 1 1⁄2 years.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.19236 of 2017 (6) dt.17-07-2017 2/2 Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of allegation and the fact that the victim is traceless as well as the petitioner is accused in eight other cases of serious nature, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner, however, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of one year. At the same time, the S.P., Begusarai is directed to ensure presence of the witnesses in the court on the date fixed so that the trial may be concluded within the period as specified. With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U