Raj Kumar Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.21089 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-130 Year-2020 Thana- SANDESH District- Bhojpur ====================================================== RAJ KUMAR YADAV SON OF BHORIK SINGH @ BHORIK YADAV RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BHATAULI, POLICE STATION- SANDESH, DISTRICT- BHOJPUR ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar BIHAR 2.

BIMAL DEVI @ BIMLA DEVI DAUGHTER OF SHRI KISHUN SINGH RESIDENT OF VILLAGE- BADRI TOLA, P.S.- PAWANA, DISTRICTBHOJPUR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 11-01-2022 Heard Mr. Shiv Prasad Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner, who is the husband of opposite party no. 2, seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Sandesh P.S. Case No. 130 of 2020 dated 25.04.2020 instituted for the offences under Sections 341, 323, 307, 494, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel for the petitioner denies that he has married again during the pendency of his marriage with the opposite party no. 2. The other accusation in the FIR also is denied by the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.21089 of 2021(2) dt.11-01-2022 2/2 However, he submits that the petitioner is ever ready to sit across the table and negotiate for settling the marital discord between the spouses. Considering the aforenoted submissions, this Court deems it appropriate to direct that in the event of the surrender of the petitioner within a period of six weeks from today, he shall be granted provisional bail and simultaneously notice shall be issued to the informant. On the appearance of the informant, the court will explore the possibilities of settlement and if the issues between the spouses are settled, the provisional bail of the petitioner shall be confirmed. The provisional bail of the petitioner shall also be confirmed in the event of the informant showing an unreasonable attitude during the deliberations. If the conduct of the petitioner is not good, that should also be taken into account before confirming the provisional bail of the petitioner.

The petition stands disposed of.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) krishna/- U T