Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.33351 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -115 Year- 2015 Thana -ATRI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Ranjit Yadav Son of Narain Yadav Resident of Village - Narawat, P.S. - Atri, District - Gaya.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satya Veer For the Opposite Party/s : Smt Renu Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 31-07-2017 Heard the parties.
The petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Atari P.S.Case NO.115 of 2015 registered for offences punishable under Section 304 of the Indian Penal Code.
Allegation against the petitioner is that he surrounded the guava tree by electric wire, which caused the electric shot to the son of the informant causing his death.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that as the son of the informant had climbed up at the guava tree for plucking the guava fruits and he received electric shot injury and it is further submitted that earlier as a matter of fact the petitioner was granted anticipatory bail by this Court, vide order dated 16.10.2015 passed in Cr. Misc. No.48633 of 2015 but he
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.33351 of 2017 (3) dt.31-07-2017 2/2 was accused in another case also, as such, he could not avail privilege of anticipatory bail and now he is in custody for more than 2 1⁄2 months.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, let the petitioner, above named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.C.J.M.-I, Gaya, in connection with Atari P.S.Case No.115 of 2015.
With following conditions :
(i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.
(iii) The petitioner shall co-operate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reason, otherwise, his bail bond shall be cancelled.
With the aforesaid observation, this application is allowed. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T