Subhash Singh @ Subhash Yadav @ Subash Singh And ANR. v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2291 of 2016 (4) dt.19-04-2016
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.2291 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -35 Year- 2014 Thana -CHARPOKHARI District- BHOJPUR ======================================================
1. Subhash Singh @ Subhash Yadav @ Subash Singh son of Chandrama Singh alias Chandrama Yadav Resident of Village- Dwadhi, Police Station- Charpokhari, District- Bhojpur.
2. Janmejay Singh son of Late Deo Sharan Singh Resident of VillageDanwar, Police Station- Kachwa, District- Rohtas. .... .... Petitioners
Versus
The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioners : Mr. Rahul Nath, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Anil Kr.Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 19-04-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 35 of 2014 for the offences instituted under Sections 7 of the Essential Commodities Act.
Case diary was called for, which has been received. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioner no.1 is the owner of the godown from where admittedly certain foodgrains are said to have been lifted surreptitiously. Petitioner no.2 is the Assistant Godown Manager of SFC who is alleged to have lifted the foodgrains which were meant for certain
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2291 of 2016 (4) dt.19-04-2016 governments schemes. He further submits that the godown was taken on rent by Mukesh Singh and he should be held responsible for any act of omission and commission. So far as petitioner no.2 Janmejay Singh is concerned, there is no material on record to indicate that he had any role as alleged in the FIR. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State after perusal of the case diary submits that there is no further cogent material to show the implication of the petitioners in the present case.
Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioners above named, be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of four weeks from today in connection with Charpokhari P.S. Case No. 35 of 2014 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned CJM, Bhojpur at Ara, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
(Anjana Mishra, J) B.Kr./- U