Jitendra Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53875 of 2015 (3) dt.19-01-2016

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53875 of 2015 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -97 Year- 2014 Thana -PIPRAHI District- SHEOHAR ====================================================== Jitendra Sahni Son of Gobari Sahni, Resident of Village- Khan Pipra, P.S.- Phenhara, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Devendra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 19-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Piprahi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2014 registered for the offence punishable under Section 364(A)/34 of the Indian Penal Code. Allegedly, the informant was abducted with motorcycle but thereafter he was released after two days. The F.I.R. has been registered against un-known and the name of the petitioner transpired in the confessional statement of co-accused. Submission is of false implication and that co-accused Rajesh Rai and Santosh Sah who have named the petitioner have already been allowed bail by another co-ordinate Bench of this Court and, as such, the petitioner also deserves sympathetic

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53875 of 2015 (3) dt.19-01-2016 consideration to which the learned A.P.P. does not dispute. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner, above named, is also directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Learned C.J.M., Sheohar arising out of Piprahi P.S. Case No. 97 of 2014 subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail. (Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T