Patna High CourtCWJC/13558/2018disposed

Faiyaz Ahmad v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-04Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.13558 of 2018 ====================================================== Faiyaz Ahmad, S/o Late Mokhtar Ahmad, R/o Officer's Colony, Budhuchak, Near Modern Idol Shool, Katihar, P.S.- Katihar, Distt.- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Inspector General Of Police, Patna Zone, Patna.

4. The Deputy Inspector General Of Police, Central range, Patna.

5. The Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna.

6. The Dy. S.P. (HQ) Patna cum Account Incharge.

7. The Accountant, S.S.P. Office, Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amresh Kumar Sinha, Adv.

For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ravi Verma, AC to GP4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date : 04-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is claiming that his pay-scale has wrongly been fixed resulting into reduction of his rate of pension.

As per petitioner, according to prior fixation, he was entitled to Rs. 9,45,905/- but, was paid Rs. 7,20,467/- and there is a difference of Rs. 2,25,438/-.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that proper pay fixation has not been done, that has caused loss to the petitioner.

Patna High Court CWJC No.13558 of 2018 dt.04-10-2018 2/2 Let the petitioner should file a proper representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, Patna with full details as to how he is claiming the amount of money which has been mentioned in the present writ application should be verified by the authority looking to his grievance with respect to wrong fixation of his pay.

Let the entire process should be completed within a period of four months from the date of receipt/production of this order.

If the authority is arrived to a finding that the claim of the petitioner is correct, it goes without saying that he will be entitled to the arrear amount which must be paid to him without unnecessary delay preferably within a period of two months after the date of order passed by the aforesaid authority. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 11.10.2018 Transmission Date