← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20036/2021bail granted

Suraj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-02-28Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20036 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2020 Thana- HILSA District- Nalanda ====================================================== 1.

SURAJ KUMAR Son of Binod Prasad @ Budba @ Vinod Kumar Resident of Mohalla - Daroga Kuan, Hilsa, P.S.- Hilsa, District - Nalanda. 2.

Bishnu Kumar Son of Anil Prasad Resident of Mohalla - Daroga Kuan, Hilsa, P.S.- Hilsa, District - Nalanda.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Anil Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 28-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of four weeks.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in connection with Hilsa P.S. case No.124 of 2020 registered under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 504, 506, 427, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

Allegation is that the accused persons including the petitioners attacked on the house of the informant armed with variously weapon and pelting stones, due to which Kumar Vinod and Sanni Kumar received injury and co-accused Shibu

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20036 of 2021(2) dt.28-02-2022 2/2 Kumar resorted firing.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioners that there is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioners. The petitioners have falsely been implicated in the present case. General and omnibus allegation has been made against the petitioners. No specific overt act is alleged against the petitioners. The allegation of firing is alleged against the coaccused Shibu Kumar. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioners are named in the complaint case/F.I.R. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioners, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Hilsa, Nalanda in connection with Hilsa P.S. case No.124 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. Narendra/- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T