Kapil @ Kapildeo Yadav @ Litra v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9229 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-20 Year-2018 Thana- BELHAR District- Banka ====================================================== Kapil @ Kapildeo Yadav @ Litra, aged 50 (Male), Son of Preetam Yadav Resident of Village- Sardara, P.O.- Gerua, P.S.- Belhar, District- Banka. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03-04-2019 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

Petitioner seeks bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 387, 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner and other F.I.R. named accused of demanding extortion money from a construction company engaged in bridge construction, to continue the work.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case only on the basis of suspicion. Similarly, situated co-accused persons have been granted bail by this Court, as contained in Annexure 2 and 3. Petitioner is in custody since 12.10.2018. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioner named above be released on bail upon

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9229 of 2019(2) dt.03-04-2019 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned court below where the case is pending in connection with Belhar P.S. Case No. 20/2018 with following conditions:- (1)Bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned.

(2) Petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and his absence on two consecutive dates without sufficient reason, his bail bond shall be cancelled by the court below.

(3) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(S. Kumar, J) Sanjay/- U T