Deo Kumar Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2907 of 2025 ====================================================== Deo Kumar Tiwari Son of Late Deo Narayan Tiwari Resident of MohallaKuraich (Mahavir Ashthan) near Canal Gali No.16, Ward No.5, Police Station- Sasaram, District-Rohtas.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Principal Secretary, Urban Development and Housing Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Urban development and Housing Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The District Magistrate, Rohtas, Sasaram.

4.

The Nagar Nigam Sasaram through its Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Sasaram 5.

The Municipal Commissioner, Nagar Nigam, Sasaram, Distirct-Rohtas. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Choubey, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr.Standing Counsel (21) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SINGH CHANDEL ORAL ORDER 20-02-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondent-State.

2. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is retired from the post of Upper Division Clerk from Nagar Nigam, Sasaram on 31.07.2007. Similarly situated person on the post of Upper Division Clerk have been granted benefit of 6th pay commission, the petitioner is not provided any benefit for which he has already made his representation before the respondents through Annexure 'P/1' but no decision has been taken yet, therefore, it is prayed by

Patna High Court CWJC No.2907 of 2025(2) dt.20-02-2025 2/2 learned counsel for the petitioner that the petition may be disposed of directing the concerned authority to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner which he raised through Annexure 'P/1' and pass a reasoned order within a stipulated period fixed by this Court.

3. The prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner is not opposed by learned counsel for the State as well as learned counsel for respondent no. 4.

4. Considering the submission made by learned counsel for both the parties, the petition is disposed of directing respondent no. 4 to consider and decide the claim of the petitioner which he raised through representation (Annexure 'P/1') and pass a reasoned order in accordance with relevant rules and laws as early as possible probably within 60 days from the receipt of the copy of this order.

5. This petition is, accordingly, disposed of. (Arvind Singh Chandel , J) tusharika/- U