Patna High CourtCR. MISC./2481/2017bail granted

Pappu Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-01-28Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2481 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -390 Year- 2016 Thana -GHORASAHAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Pappu Kumar, son of Bahadur Rajak,

2. Keshaw Kumar, son of Nandlal Prasad @ Nandulal Prasad, Both residents of Village- Jagarnath Pakari, P.S.- Siwaipatti, DistrictMuzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma, Advocate For the Opposite Party : Mr. Umesh Lal Verma (APP) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 28-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S Case No. 390 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 272, 273 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 47(a), 53, 54 of the Bihar Excise Amendment Act. Allegedly, the petitioners were arrested with several bottles of foreign liquor which comes to total 32.56 liters and they are in custody since 02.10.2016 having no criminal antecedent. In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioners are directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of like

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2481 of 2017 (2) dt.28-01-2017 2/2 amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran, in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No. 390 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the Court concerned and the petitioners shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on their part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioners from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J.) Rajiv/- U T