Chand Mian @ Rizwan @ Nesar v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43575 of 2014 (4) dt.23-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.43575 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2013 Thana -SUGAULI District- EAST CHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Chand Mian @ Rizwan @ Nesar Son of Sattar Mian Resident of Mohalla-Khoda Nagar, P.S.-Chattauni, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.43709 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -194 Year- 2013 Thana -SUGAULI District- EAST CHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ======================================================

1. Dhanilal Kumar Son of Puran Sah Resident of Mohalla- Laxmipur, P.S.- Palanava, District- East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.43575 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar (App) (In Cr.Misc. No.43709 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Yogendra Kr. Singh(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HEMANT KUMAR SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 23-04-2015 Both the above stated petitions have arisen out of Sugauli P.S. Case No. 194 of 2013 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 394, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and accordingly, both the above stated petitions are being disposed

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.43575 of 2014 (4) dt.23-04-2015 of by this common order.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. Petitioners are not named in the first information report but in course of investigation, the name of petitioners surfaced on the basis of suspicion and after that they were arrested and confessed their guilt. Except the aforesaid material as well as criminal antecedent, there appears to be nothing against them. The court below has reported that still the case is pending for commitment.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances as well as submissions of the parties, let the petitioners, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran in connection with Sugauli P.S. Case No. 194 of 2013. (Hemant Kumar Srivastava, J) SHAHZAD/- U T