← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9469/2026bail granted

Dharam Roy @ Dharam Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-03-26Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9469 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-510 Year-2025 Thana- BABUBARHI District- Madhubani ====================================================== Dharam Roy @ Dharam Kumar S/o- Hari Shankar Roy Village- Sakhua PSJhanjharpur Naraihiya District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Prakash, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Dr. Ajeet Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 26-03-2026

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 351(2), 352 and 3(5) of the BNS, 2023.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent. It is next submitted that there is a land dispute in between the informant and fatherin-law of the petitioner, on account of which the petitioner came to be implicated in the instant case with an allegation that he assaulted the informant by butt of pistol causing injury on head.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR, it would manifest that the case has not been instituted under the Arms

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9469 of 2026(2) dt.26-03-2026 2/2 Act. It is also submitted that in order to coerce his father-in-law in submission, the petitioner has been implicated in the instant case by the informant. It is next submitted that even presuming what has been alleged is true without admitting then the injury suffered by the injured has been opined to be simple in nature.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner.

6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Babubarhi P.S. Case No. 510 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of BNSS.

7. Accordingly, the instant anticipatory bail application stands allowed.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishabh/- U T