← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./20619/2021bail granted

Binju Patwari v. The State Of Bihar

2021-09-23Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20619 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2020 Thana- BHANGHA District- West Champaran ====================================================== BINJU PATWARI SON OF SHRI RAMAYAN PATWARI @ RAMNARAYAN PATWARI R/O - HARDIYA, P.S.- MANPUR, DISTRICTWEST CHAMPARAN. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bimlesh Kumar Pandey, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mukesh Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PARTHA SARTHY ORAL ORDER 23-09-2021 Heard learned counsel for the parties through video conferencing.

The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in a case registered under sections 20, 21, 23, 24 and 27 of the N.D.P.S. Act.

As per the prosecution case, the two accused persons i.e. the petitioner herein and Ram Pravesh Diswa are stated to have thrown their bag that they were carrying and made an attempt to escape but were caught. It is stated that on search, 10 kgs of ganja was recovered from the bag.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case. No incriminating article has been recovered from his possession.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20619 of 2021(2) dt.23-09-2021 2/2 The allegations levelled in the F.I.R. are false and concocted. The petitioner has remained in custody since 27.9.2020 and has no criminal antecedent. Chargesheet has been submitted in the case. It is further submitted that co-accused Ram Pravesh Diswa has been enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.7.2021 passed in Cr. Misc. no.20342 of 2021 and pursuant to the direction contained in the said order, as now charge has been framed, he has been released from custody.

The application for bail is opposed by learned A.P.P. for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and taking into consideration grant of bail to co-accused, the petitioner not having any criminal antecedent and having remained in custody for about 1 year, the Court directs the petitioner to be enlarged on bail in connection with T.R. no.57 of 2020 (arising out of Bhangaha P.S. Case no.61 2020) on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/ (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Sessions Judge III, West Champaran, Bettiah. (Partha Sarthy, J) Saurabh/- U T