Jayadu Mukherjee @ Jayant Mukherjee v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10128 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-71 Year-2021 Thana- GAYA RAIL P.S. District- Gaya ====================================================== Jayadu Mukherjee @ Jayant Mukherjee Son Of Ajay Mukherjee R/O VillageSonarpur Ramchandra Area, P.S.- Narendrapur, District- Dokhani 24 Pargana (WEST Bengal) ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravindra Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Brajendra Nath Pandey, A.P.P ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KHATIM REZA ORAL ORDER 27-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

Let the defect (s), as pointed out by the office, be removed within a period of four weeks form today. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 392/411 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, in short, is that while the informant Rekha Das was boarding train, one accused person snatched her golden chain from her neck thereafter, she raised alarm and the accused person apprehended.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and he has been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10128 of 2022(2) dt.27-07-2022 2/2 case merely on suspicion and presumption. It is further submitted that nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner, but a fake seizure list was prepared showing recovery of locket. Further, it is submitted that the petitioner was apprehended by the informant and her brother and produced before the police and she alleged that her golden chain was taken away by the petitioner but the said golden chain was not recovered from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 07.04.2021, is a person with clean antecedent and charge-sheet has been submitted in the case. Learned A.P.P for the State opposes the prayer for regular bail of the petitioner.

Considering the facts and circumstances of this case, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) only with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfation of the learned Railway Judicial Magistrate, Gaya, in connection with Gaya Rail P.S Case No. 71 of 2021.

(Khatim Reza, J) shanu/- U T