Masudan Manjhi @ Madhunandan Manjhi v. The State Of Bihar
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3276 of 2017 (4) dt.27-03-2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3276 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -293 Year- 2016 Thana -SHERGHATI District- GAYA ======================================================
1. Masudan Manjhi @ Madhunandan Manjhi, Son of Munshi Manjhi, Resident of Village- Lalgarh, P.S.- Sherghati, District- Gaya. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Uday Chand Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARVIND SRIVASTAVA ORAL ORDER 27-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.
Petitioner is in custody since 09.07.2016 in connection with Sherghati P.S. Case No. 293 of 2016 registered under Sections 302 and 201 of the Indian Penal Code.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner, who is of clean antecedent, is innocent and has not committed any offence. In fact, the petitioner happens to be husband of the deceased was not present on the day of occurrence. No any witnesses have supported the prosecution version and merely on suspicion, the petitioner has been made accused in this case and rotting in custody for the seven months.
Learned A.P.P. for the State has opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioner and submitted that the petitioner who is husband of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3276 of 2017 (4) dt.27-03-2017 the deceased has killed his wife, which is evident from paragraph nos. 4, 11, 17, 18 and 19 of the case diary.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the and the nature of accusation, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the prayer for regular bail of this petitioner is rejected.
(Arvind Srivastava, J) brajesh/- U T