Patna High CourtCWJC/267/2017dismissed

Bikrama Pandey v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-05-05Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,The Chief Justice2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.267 of 2017 =========================================================== Bikrama Pandey, Son of Late Saryug Pandey, resident of Village- Khaita, P.S. Dinara, District- Rohtas at Sasaram, At present at Akhil Bhartiya Sikshit Berojgar Yuva Kalyan Sansthan, Pradhan Kalyan, Nokha.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary Govt. of Bihar Patna Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Managing Director, Mahila Vikas Nigam Patna, Ram Chatira Singh Path, Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.

3. The Pariyojana Director, Rupesh Sinha, Mahila Vikash Nigam Patna, Ram Charitra Path Bailey Road, Patna- 800001.

4. The District Pariyojana Manager, Rohtas Mahila Vikas, Nigam Rohtas at Sasaram.

5. Deputy Development Commissioner, Rohtas at Sasaram.

6. The District Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram.

7. Afrim Taranjum Ex- Project Manager Mahila Help Line Rohtas at Sasaram at Mohalla- Sherganj, P.S. Sasaram Nagar Rohtas at Sasaram.

8. The Secretary, Samaj Kalyan Bibhag Old Secretariat, Bihar Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 05-05-2017 This Public Interest Litigation has been filed for directing respondents to notify the vacancies and also to take steps for filling up of various posts.

It is said that Respondent No. 7 is working illegally, she should be removed and the post filled up by advertisement in a proper newspaper.

Patna High Court CWJC No.267 of 2017 dt.05-05-2017 2/2 The matter pertains to appointment under scheme in question. It is not a statutory scheme and for the said purpose Public Interest Litigation is not maintainable. We dismiss the same as we are not inclined to take cognizance of it and make any indulgence into the matter.

(Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Sudhir Singh, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 10.05.2017 Transmission Date