Chappit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.20571 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-258 Year-2020 Thana- PALIGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== 1.

CHAPPIT YADAV Son of Late Shiv Charan Yadav Resident of VillageDariyapur, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna. 2.

Sukesh Yadav @ Sukesh Kumar Son of Ram Ayodhya Yadav @ Ram Adhyoadhya @ Kariman Yadav Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna.

3.

Raj Kumar Yadav Son of Samta Yadav @ Sammat Yadav Resident of Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Paliganj, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Dilip Kumar No.1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 17-02-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners is expected to honour his undertaking given in the instant case for depositing the requisite court fee and to remove the defect(s) as pointed out by the office when called upon to do so by the office. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 504, 308 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is a case of assault upon the informant and Sunil Kumar by means of Khanti and also snatched golden chain from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.20571 of 2021(3) dt.17-02-2022 2/2 the informant by the accused persons.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that there is case and counter case between the parties. He further submits that from perusal of the case diary, it appears that no injury report is annexed with this case diary in respect of the injured persons. Petitioners have clean antecedent. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the petitioners, above named in the event of their arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sub Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Danapur, District-Patna in connection with Paliganj P.S. Case No. 258 of 2020, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) brajesh kumar/- U T