Shyam Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.10430 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-277 Year-2025 Thana- JAYNAGAR District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Shyam Kumar Singh S/O Late Rajeshwar Singh R/O Village- Laksariya, Ward No. 10, P.S - Jaynagar, Districts - Madhubani. 2.

Raushan Kumar Singh S/O Shyam Kumar Singh R/O Village- Laksariya, Ward No.- 10, P.S - Jaynagar, Districts - Madhubani. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Alias Ashok Karn, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEEN KUMAR ORAL ORDER 01-04-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioners have preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 277 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 126(2), 115(2), 118(2), 109, 352 and 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023 and Sections 25(1-b)a, 26, 27 of the Amrs Act.

3. The prosecution story, in short, is that, at the behest of petitioner no. 1, petitioner no. 2 opened fire at the informant, causing him grievous injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that there is a case and counter case between the parties and the petitioners

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.10430 of 2026(3) dt.01-04-2026 2/2 side also lodged the F.I.R. bearing Jaynagar P.S. Case No. 69 of 2025 against the informant and his family members and as per the F.I.R. itself, there is a land dispute between the parties. It has also been submitted that despite being a gun shot wound, the injury is classified as simple in nature and there is no allegation of repetition of firing against the petitioners. It has lastly been submitted that the petitioners have one criminal antecedent in which they are on bail and are in custody since 15.08.2025.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the petitioners.

6. Considering the aforesaid submissions of the parties and taking into account the facts and circumstance of the case, let the petitioners above-named, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Madhubani, in connection with Jayanagar P.S. Case No. 277 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Praveen Kumar, J) Jyoti/- U T