Belal @ Belal Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4721 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -658 Year- 2016 Thana -ARARIA District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Belal @ Belal Ansari, S/o - Salim @ Salim Ansari, Resident of VillageBairgachhi, Momin Tola, P.S.- Araria(Bairgachhi), District- Araria .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Md. Naushad Uzzoha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Surendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 379 of the Indian Penal Code and later on added Section 411 of the Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that name of the petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of the co-accused and nothing has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. He is in custody for more than four months. It is further submitted that subsequently in six other cases though petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. but later on, he has been implicated in those cases.

Heard learned A.P.P. also. He could not controvert the fact that except confessional statement there is nothing against the petitioner.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4721 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that except confessional statement of the co-accused there is nothing against the petitioner, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Araria P.S. Case no. 658 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned and the other bailor shall be a close family member of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T