Guddu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3844 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -151 Year- 2016 Thana -GAYGHAT District- MUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Guddu Singh, Son of Harishankar Singh, Resident of VillageAnjanakot(Bathana), P.S.-Motipur, District- Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ------------- 08-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.151 of 2016 registered under Section 395 of the Indian Penal Code.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that it is alleged that on the next date of the occurrence, the petitioner was apprehended by the villagers with the stolen vehicle, as detailed in paragraph-5 of the case diary, and, thereafter, the petitioner was remanded in the present case by the police. Further submission is that, in fact, the petitioner was apprehended by the villagers on mere suspicion near the vehicle. While the informant has claimed about theft of his vehicle by the persons, who had hired his vehicle, but the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3844 of 2017 (3) dt.08-03-2017 2/2 petitioner was not put on T.I. Parade for identification by the informant. The petitioner is in custody since 31.08.2016. While the petitioner is accused in one more case, as detailed in paragraph-3 to this application, but in that case, the petitioner is on bail.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Sri S.K. Rai, Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Muzaffarpur, in connection with Gaighat P.S. Case No.151 of 2016. Out of the two sureties, one must be close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he/she is related with the petitioner. The bailors will undertake to furnish information to the court about any change in the address of the petitioner. Further, the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date, as fixed in the case, during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to attend the trial court on two consecutive dates, during the course of the trial, without any reasonable cause being shown, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T