Shankar Mahto v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2099 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -2 Year- 2005 Thana -KAUAKOL District- NAWADA ====================================================== Shankar Mahto, Son of Ram Swaroop Mahto, Resident of Village - Bijho, P.S. - Kauwakola, District - Nawada.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Opposite Party/s : Mr.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER ---------- 23-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kauwakola P.S. Case No.02 of 2005/Trial No.1095 of 2016 registered under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 504 and 325 of the Indian Penal Code.

This is a case of misuse of privilege of bail by the petitioner for about nine years. The petitioner appears to be in custody since 15.11.2016.

Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that except the present case, the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. Further submission is that the petitioner undertakes

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2099 of 2017 (2) dt.23-01-2017 2/2 that he will attend the court on each and every date fixed in the case during the course of trial.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nawada, in connection with Kawakola P.S. Case No.02 of 2005/Trial No.1095 of 2016. It is made clear that the petitioner shall attend the trial court on each and every date fixed in the case during the course of the trial. If the petitioner fails to attend the court during the course of the trial on two consecutive dates without any reasonable cause being shown, the trial court would be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioner.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) P.S./- U T