Satyabansh Singh @ Satywant Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2605 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2605 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -559 Year- 2016 Thana -ARA NAWADA District- BHOJPUR ====================================================== Satyabansh Singh @ Satywant Singh, Son of Sri Girdhar Singh, resident of Pipara, Police Station- Garhani, District- Bhojpur, At Present S.B.I. Bank Backgali, Pandit Ka House, Police Station- Nawada Ara, District- Bhojpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anil Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 16-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 559 of 2016 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a,26/35 of the Arms Act. Allegedly, two miscreants succeeded in fleeing away but one Manish Kumar was caught and from his possession one pistol and two live cartridges were recovered besides one mobile. One motorcycle was also there and Manish Kumar told that it is of the petitioner and it is stated that petitioner and one Saral Singh fled away.

Submission is of false implication and that nothing has been recovered from possession of the petitioner, he has been named on the basis of statement of co-accused Manish, the sister

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2605 of 2017 (2) dt.16-02-2017 of the petitioner is a student of the college and after standing the motorcycle he had gone in the college with his sister and in the meantime the Police seized the motorcycle of the petitioner, the petitioner is suffering in custody since 20.09.2016 and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration to which learned APP opposes.

In the facts and circumstances stated above, the petitioner above named is directed to be released on bail on execution of bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Nawada P.S. Case No. 559 of 2016, subject to the conditions that one of the bailors must be a near relative and another having sufficient immovable property within the territorial jurisdiction of the court concerned and the petitioner shall remain present on each and every date during trial and the default on two consecutive dates on his part without any reason shall disentitle the petitioner from privilege of bail.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) avin/- U T