Aftab @ Aftab Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.16123 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-307 Year-2020 Thana- CHIRAIYA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Aftab @ Aftab Alam S/o Sheikh Alamgir @ Alamgir R/o Madhopur, P.S. - Chiraiya, Distt. - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Asif Kalim For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 06-02-2025

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad.

2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the anticipatory bail application of the petitioner was earlier rejected by an order dated 10.01.2022 in Cr. Misc. No.26196/2021 by a learned Co-ordinate Bench. It is further submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR it would manifest that allegation against this petitioner is of assaulting the injured by an iron rod causing injury on hand. It is next submitted that no doubt the petitioner is alleged to have assaulted but then the assault is not on vital part of the body and was not repeated and

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.16123 of 2024(2) dt.06-02-2025 2/2 on intervention of the well-wishers the parties have compromised. It is also submitted that Abdul Malik Ansari had also approached this Court seeking anticipatory bail by filing Cr. Misc. No.14636/2023 for the second time and the same was allowed by an order dated 19.06.2023. It is also submitted that since informant does not pursue the case any further, as such, no useful purpose would be served by sending the petitioner to jail.

4. Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

5. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned trial court within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 307 of 2020 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T