← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./14601/2024bail granted

Mentar Devi @ Mintar Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-05-01Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.14601 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-495 Year-2023 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== 1.

Mentar Devi @ Mintar Devi Wife of Ram Adhar Rai Resident of VillageDarwa, P.S.- Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District- Samastipur 2.

Ram Adhar Ray Son of Late Rambrish Ray Resident of Village- Darwa, P.S.- Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District- Samastipur 3.

Jitendra Ray @ Jitendra Kumar Son of Ram Adhar Ray Resident of VillageDarwa, P.S.- Tajpur (Halai O.P.), District- Samastipur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Raja Ram Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-05-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

2. Petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341 , 324, 307, 354 , 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code .

3. As per F.I.R, it is alleged that petitioner No. 3 Jitendra Ray assaulted the informant by means of Katta causing injury on his leg, thereafter all the accused persons started pressing his neck and petitioner No. 1 Mintar Devi caught his testicle and when wife of informant came to save then petitioner No. 2 Ramadhar Rai assaulted her with gransa causing injury

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.14601 of 2024(3) dt.01-05-2024 2/2 on her head.

4. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioners that the petitioners are innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case . F.I.R., has been lodged after the delay of 5 days for which there is no plausible explanation . Injury allegedly caused by these petitioners is found to be simple in nature .

5. Learned counsel for the State oppose the bail petition.

6. Considering the nature of injury and other circumstances of the case, in the event of arrest or surrender within six weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM-I, Samastipur in connection with Tajpur P.S. Case No. 495 of 2023 , subject to the conditions laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure .

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Koushik/- U T