← Library
Patna High CourtMJC/381/2023disposed

Manoj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-02-23Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.381 of 2023 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.5891 of 2015 ====================================================== Manoj Kumar son of Rajendra Prasad, resident of Mohalla- Officer s Colony, Mirehalbari, P.O.- Katihar Court, P.S.- Katihar Sahayak, District- Katihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through Mr. B. Karkey Dhanji, fathers name not known, the I.G. Registration-Cum- Excise Commissioner, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 2.

Mr. K.K. Pathak, fathers name not known, the Commissioner-CumSecretary, Registration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna. 3.

Mr Manoj Kumar, fathers name not known, the Deputy Inspector General of Registration, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4.

Mr. Uddyan Mishra, fathers name not known, the Collector, Katihar. 5.

Mr. Mohan Paswan, fathers name not known, the Deputy Collector, Katihar. 6.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar fathers name not known, The Treasury Officer, Katihar. 7.

Mr. Uddyan Mishra, fathers name not known, The District Registrar, Katihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghvendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar (SC-11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 23-02-2024 Though the present contempt petition has been filed raising a grievance regarding noncompliance of the order dated 19.07.2022 passed by this Court in CWJC No. 5891 of 2015, however, considering the fact that the said writ petition had stood withdrawn and no positive direction had been issued by the said order dated 19.07.2022, the learned senior counsel for the petitioner seeks

Patna High Court MJC No.381 of 2023(3) dt.23-02-2024 2/2 not to press the present petition, however, seeks liberty on behalf of the petitioner to avail such remedies as are available under the law. It goes without saying that the petitioner is free to avail appropriate remedies, in case the same are feasible.

2.

Accordingly, the contempt petition stands disposed off as not pressed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) S.Sb/- U