Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3814/2017rejected

Manoj Sahni @ Manoj Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-22Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3814 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -200 Year- 2015 Thana -KODHA District- KATIHAR ====================================================== Manoj Sahni @ Manoj Sahani, son of Binde Sahni, Resident of Navtoliya, P.S. Bahera, District- Darbhanga at present resided at Village- Charkhi, P.S. Korha, District- Katihar.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Prem Ranjan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Ashok Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 22-03-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned A.P.P for the State.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail which was earlier rejected by order dated 08.03.2016 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 56976 of 2015 which was disposed of with Cr. Misc. No. 56207 of 2015, on the ground that the petitioner is suffering in custody since 18.10.2015 and there is no legal and tangible material against him, besides confessional statement nothing has come against the petitioner and as such he deserves sympathetic consideration.

The learned A.P.P. opposes prayer for bail by submitting that just after six months of the marriage the petitioner killed his wife Radha Devi.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3814 of 2017 (3) dt.22-03-2017 2/2 In the facts and circumstances as stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of prayer for bail of the petitioner, again prayer for bail of the petitioner stands rejected in connection with Sessions Trial No. 40 of 2016 arising out of Korha P.S. Case No. 200 of 2015 pending in the court of the Additional Sessions Judge-II, Katihar.

However, considering custody of the petitioner, let the trial be expedited and concluded as early as possible preferably within a period of six months from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) Abhay/- U T