← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/2575/2019disposed

Suresh Bhuiyan v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-05-03Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2575 of 2019 ====================================================== Suresh Bhuiyan, aged about 49 years (Male), Son of Yogeshwar Bhuiyan, resident of Village- Singhpur, P.S. Banke Bazar, District- Gaya. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Food and Consumer Protection, Bihar, Patna.

2.

The District Magistrate, Gaya.

3.

The Sub Divisional Officer Sherghati, Gaya.

4.

The Addl. District Supply Officer, Gaya.

5.

The Block Supply Officer Banke Bazar, Gaya.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sudhir Kumar Sinha For the Respondent/s :

Mr.S.Raza Ahmad (Aag5) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 03-05-2019 After some argument, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the writ application may be disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail the statutory remedy of appeal under the provisions of the Bihar Targeted Public Distribution System (Control) Order, 2016.

Learned counsel for the State has no objection to the petitioner's applying for an appropriate remedy. In the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this writ application is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to prefer a statutory appeal before the District Magistrate, Gaya (Respondent No.2) within a period of 30 days from today. On

Patna High Court CWJC No.2575 of 2019(2) dt.03-05-2019 2/2 petitioner's filing a statutory appeal, the same will be considered by Respondent No.2 and will be disposed of within a period of 60 days from the date of filing of the complaint by a reasoned order. The petitioner shall be at liberty to take all such pleas which are available to him. In case, if a question of limitation arises, the same will be considered keeping in mind that the petitioner was pursuing his remedy before this Court. (Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/- U