Md. Jiaul Haque @ Md. Jiaul Haq v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.12184 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-326 Year-2024 Thana- LADANIA District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.
Md. Jiaul Haque @ Md. Jiaul Haq S/O Md. Modibul Hasan R/o VillagePiprahi, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani 2.
Md. Inamul Haque S/O Md. Modibul Hasan R/o Village- Piprahi, P.S.- Ladaniya, District- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Md. Sobhan Asghar, Adv.
Mr. Ashad, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Binod Kumar, APP For the informant :
Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, Adv.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 13-05-2025 Heard Mr. Sobhan Asghar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey, learned counsel representing the informant.
2. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Ladaniya P.S. Case No. 326 of 2024 for the offence registered under sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 303(2), 352, 351(2), 3/5 of BNS, 2023 lodged on 08.10.2024 by the informant, Tajuddin.
3. As per the FIR, the informant alleged that as the accused-petitioner was not paying rent, he demanded the same or wanted him to vacate. Infuriated, he gave scissor blow on his head causing injury. Further, the other accused persons also
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.12184 of 2025(3) dt.13-05-2025 2/2 assaulted him which led to him moving to the hospital and then to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that actually there was an agreement between the parties that the informant shall be selling the aforesaid land to him, took money but chose to look the other way which led to certain scuffle between the parties.
5. Mr. Manoj Kumar Pandey on the other hand has taken this Court to learned Sessions Judge order to show that the injury was found on the left side parietal region by sharp cutting weapon and the Doctor has opined the same to be grievous in nature.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also that the petitioner has criminal antecedent, the injury has been found to be grievous in nature, in that background, this Court is not inclined to extend him privilege of anticipatory bail.
7. The petition is accordingly rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Vijay Singh/- U T