← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./29556/2017rejected

Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2017-08-08Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.29556 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -KARPI District- JEHANABAD ======================================================

1. Arvind Singh @ Arvind Kumar Son of Nageshwar Singh, resident of Village/ Mohalla- Shivnagar, P.S.- Karpi, District- Arwal. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ravi Ranjan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL ORDER 08-08-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is languishing in custody since 11.04.2017 in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 44/16 for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201, 120-B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case, as lodged by the informant, is that his daughter Ruby Kumari was married to the petitioner in the year 2004, the petitioner along with family members used to torture her and eventually burnt her to death and disposed of the dead body for non-fulfillment of demand of dowry. It has been submitted by the learned counsel for the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.29556 of 2017 (3) dt.08-08-2017 2/2 petitioner that he is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the aforesaid case. He submits that, in fact, the deceased died while making tea and there was no demand of dowry ever. However, learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances and the materials on record, I am not inclined to grant privilege of bail to the petitioner at this stage in connection with Karpi P.S. Case No. 44/16, pending in the court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur.

Application is, accordingly, rejected.

(Nilu Agrawal, J) Rajesh/- U T