Satyam Shivam Sundaram v. The Union Of India

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3023 of 2022 ====================================================== Satyam Shivam Sundaram Son of Sri Radha Krishan Singh, Resident of Gandhi Nagar, East of Patliputra Railway Station, P.S. - Rajiv Nagar, District - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The Union of India through the Secretary, Department of Ministry of Road Transport and Highway Authority of India, New Delhi. 2.

The Secretary, Department of Ministry of Road Transport and Highway Authority of India, New Delhi.

3.

The National Highway Authority through its Chairman. 4.

The Additional Chief Secretary, Road Construction Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

5.

The District Magistrate, Begusarai.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s :

Dr. K.N. Singh (Asg) Mr. Manoj Kumar Ambastha (Sc 26) Mr. Anjani Kumar (Aag 4) Mr. Sanat Kumar Mishra Mr. Kumar Priya Ranjan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER (Per: HONOURABLE THE ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 15-09-2025 None appears for the petitioner.

"That the instant writ application in the nature of Public Interest Litigation is being filed for issuance of an appropriate writ(s)/order(s)/direction(s) for commanding the respondent authorities to construct and complete the project of National Highway No. 31, Begusarai

Patna High Court CWJC No.3023 of 2022(11) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 Elevated Corridor with utmost sincerity and promptitude within timeline fixed for the completion of the aforesaid project."

2. Learned counsel for the respondent - National Highway Authority of India, on instruction, submitted that 90 % of the work is already executed as on this day. For completion of remaining of the work, three months time is granted.

3. With the above observation, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

4. In the event of non-completion of the work, petitioner is at liberty to file interlocutory application to revive this order.

(P. B. Bajanthri, ACJ) (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) GAURAV S./- U