Janardan Mandal v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.4686 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -209 Year- 2016 Thana -RANIGANJ District- ARRARIA ====================================================== Janardan Mandal S/o Late Jagdish Mandal, Resident of Village- Basgarha, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Binod Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shyam Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 14-02-2017 This is an application for grant of bail for offences punishable under Sections 302, 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that except confessional statement, there is nothing against the petitioner. Informant is the eye witness to the occurrence but inspite of that he has not named the petitioner in this case. Later on, on the basis of confessional statement he has been made accused in the present case. Petitioner has got no criminal antecedent.

Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides, in view of the fact that he has falsely been involved in this case and he is custody for about

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.4686 of 2017 (2) dt.14-02-2017 2/2 six months, let above named petitioner be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty-five thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Araria, in connection with Raniganj P.S. Case no. 209 of 2016 with the following conditions:- (i) One of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned. (ii) The petitioner will not induce any witness or tamper with the evidence.

(iii) The petitioner shall cooperate in the disposal of trial and make himself available as and when required by the court and on the event of failure on his part to appear before the court below on two consecutive dates without showing any genuine reasons, the prosecution is free to move for cancellation of his bail.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) sudip/- U T