Bablu Tuddu v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.3113 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -33 Year- 2013 Thana -CHANAN District- LAKHISARAI ====================================================== Bablu Tuddu, Son of Raman Tuddu, resident of Village- Kandni, P.S.- Kharagpur (Haweli Kharagpur), District- Munger. .... .... Petitioner
Versus
The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party : Mr. Harendra Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 29-03-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
The petitioner is languishing in custody since 02.03.2015 in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 33 of 2013 for the offences instituted under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 307, 427, 120(B) of the IPC, 27 of the Arms Act, 3/4 of the Explosive Substance Act, 150, 151, 152 of the Railway Act and 16, 18(B) and 20 of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act. The prosecution story, in brief, is that the members of the banned organization, Naxalite in order to destabilize the Government at the cost of life of innocent persons hurled bomb, made indiscriminate firing over Train No. 13331 UP and during course thereof, one of the members of Escort Party, two
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3113 of 2017 (3) dt.29-03-2017 2/3 passengers were killed while others also sustained injuries including that of informant. They have also snatched away weapons from the possession of Escort Party and looted away belongings of some of the passengers. The miscreants were shown more than hundred in number having variously armed. The earlier bail application was rejected vide Cr. Misc. No. 50388 of 2015 on 11.08.2016 with a direction to the court below to expedite the trial. A report was called for from the court below. It has been reported that the charges have already been framed in this case.
It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 02.03.2015 and the charge has already been framed. The petitioner undertakes to co-operate in course of trial. General and omnibus allegation has been made. The other co-accused persons have been granted bail vide Cr. Misc. No. 10900 of 2015 and Cr. Misc. No. 39578 of 2015. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the name of the petitioner has come in course of investigation. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned C.J.M., Lakhisarai,
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3113 of 2017 (3) dt.29-03-2017 3/3 in connection with Chanan P.S. Case No. 33 of 2013. U.K./- (Sudhir Singh, J) U T