← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./9462/2020bail granted

Satish Kumar @ Satish Kumar Yadav @ Chhotu Yadav @ Chhotu v. The State Of Bihar

2020-02-27Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.9462 of 2020 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-56 Year-2019 Thana- MUNGER MUFFASIL District- Munger ====================================================== SATISH KUMAR @ SATISH KUMAR YADAV @ CHHOTU YADAV @ CHHOTU Son of Shiv Shankar Prasad @ Shankar Yadav Resident of Village - Sandalpur (Mongra Pokhar), P.S. - Mufassil, District - Munger. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kumar Kamal Nayan For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 27-02-2020 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2019, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 504 and 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

The accusation is that informant Bikash Kumar along with his cousin brother Vipul Kumar Yadav, Ajay Kumar Yadav @ Pappu Yadav, Dipak Yadav and Gaurav Kumar Yadav were returning in the night of 14/15-02-2019 after attending the Tilak ceremony, in the way, five persons named in the F.I.R., including the petitioner, having firearm in their hand came there and asked to stop the motorcycle. At that time, Santosh Yadav @ Munnabir shot fire at the informant,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.9462 of 2020(2) dt.27-02-2020 2/2 while he tried to move with the motorcycle, but Sagar Yadav and Badal Yadav also fired, which hit to his cousin brother Vipul Yadav, anyhow, all fled away from there. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that while the petitioner is named in the F.I.R., but there is no allegation of making firing against the petitioner either on informant or anyone. The petitioner has no criminal antecedent and he is in custody since 16.11.2019. Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Munger in connection with Muffasil P.S. Case No. 56 of 2019. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T