← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/4123/2019dismissed

Prity Priyadarshini v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2019-09-26Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4123 of 2019 ====================================================== Prity Priyadarshini D/o Shri Shashi Kumar Poddar Resident of Azad Nagar,Road No.2 near Dr. D.Nath,P.S. Motilhari,Dist.-East Champaran ... ... Petitioner

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary,Agriculture Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna 2.

The Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna-1 3.

The Director, Agriculture Department,Govt. of Bihar,Patna-1 4.

Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna-Veterinary College,Patna-14 5.

The Secretary, Bihar Staff Selection Commission Patna-Veterinary College,Patna-14 ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vivekanand Vivek For the State :

Mr.Raghwanand (Ga11) For BSSC :

Dr. Ratan Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 26-09-2019 The writ petition has been filed seeking direction for issuing appointment letter to the petitioner in terms of recommendation issued by the respondent Commission under WBC (Women Backward Category) category.

The petitioner had approached this Court originally without enclosing the revised result. After indulgence granted to the petitioner twice now the same has been placed on record. The revised result, which as per averments made in the writ petition, was uploaded by the Commission on the website in December 2017 has been enclosed by way of supplementary affidavit. The petitioner is admittedly not one of the candidates declared qualified or selected in

Patna High Court CWJC No.4123 of 2019(6) dt.26-09-2019 2/2 the category of WBC.

In the circumstances, there is no scope for praying for appointment letter to be issued in favour of the petitoner since he has not qualified.

Prayer made in the writ petition, as framed, is not maintainable.

The writ petition is dismissed.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SNkumar/- U