← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14954/2018disposed

Bindeshwari Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2020-11-23Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14954 of 2018 ====================================================== Bindeshwari Prasad Singh Son of Chandrika Singh, Resident of Village+P.O.- Sultanur, P.S.- Mohivddin Nagar, District- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State Of Bihar through the Chief Secretary 2.

The Director, Department of Education, State of Bihar. 3.

The Finance Officer, Department of Finance, Bihar. 4.

The Accountant General, State of Bihar.

5.

The District Magistrate, Samastipur.

6.

The District Education Officer, Samastipur.

7.

The Area Education Officer, Samastipur.

8.

The Treasury Officer, Samastipur.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Smt.Binita Singh -SC28 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 23-11-2020 Heard Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Smt. Binita Singh, learned S.C.28 through video conferencing.

The petitioner in this writ petition seeks direction to the respondents to make payment of Provident Fund, Full Pension after fixation of pay from May, 2017 with admissible D.A.

The State as well as Accountant General filed counteraffidavit. The State in its counter-affidavit made specific averment that all the retiral dues of the petitioner have already

Patna High Court CWJC No.14954 of 2018(10) dt.23-11-2020 2/2 been paid and on submission of papers vide P.P.O. No.356406, pension has been ordered to be paid.

Having considered the facts, I dispose of this writ petition with liberty to the petitioner that if the petitioner feels that any dues is still lying with the respondents, the petitioner may file representation before the concerned authority who shall consider and dispose of the representation of the petitioner within three months from the date of filing of such representation and if the petitioner is at all aggrieved, the petitioner may again move this Court for redressal of his grievance.

With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) Saurabh/- U